Internet-Draft RFC 8928-Fix April 2025
Thubert & Rashid Expires 30 October 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
6lo
Updates:
8928 (if approved)
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
P. Thubert
A. Rashid
P Bari

Fixing the C-Flag in EARO

Abstract

This document updates RFC 8928, “Address-Protected Neighbor Discovery for Low-Power and Lossy Networks” (AP-ND), by updating the bit position for the C-flag and registering it with IANA.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 30 October 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

The “Address-Protected Neighbor Discovery for Low-Power and Lossy Networks” (AP-ND) [RFC8928] , initially defined the C-flag in the EARO in bit position 3; later [RFC9685] defined the P-field in bits 2 and 3 of the EARO flags field with proper IANA registration, causing an overlap with Figure 1 of [RFC8928] which depicts the location of the C-flag.

This specification updates [RFC8928] by repositioning the C-flag as bit 1 of the EARO flags field, thereby preventing conflicts.

2. Terminology

2.1. Requirements Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

2.2. References

This document uses terms and concepts that are discussed in:

  • Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 [RFC4861]
  • IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration [RFC4862]
  • Neighbor Discovery Optimization for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs) [RFC6775]
  • Registration Extensions for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Neighbor Discovery [RFC8505]
  • IPv6 Backbone Router [RFC8929]
  • Address-Protected Neighbor Discovery for Low-Power and Lossy Networks [RFC8928]
  • Listener Subscription for IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Multicast and Anycast Addresses [RFC9685]

2.3. Acronyms

This document uses the following abbreviations:

6LN:
6LoWPAN Node
6LBR:
6LoWPAN Border Router
6LR:
6LoWPAN Router
AP-ND:
Address-Protected Neighbor Discovery
ARO:
Address Registration Option
CIPO:
Crypto-ID Parameters Option
DAD:
Duplicate Address Detection
EARO:
Extended Address Registration Option
LLN:
Low-Power and Lossy Network
LoWPAN:
Low-Rate Personal Area Network (IEEE Std. 802.15.4) [IEEE802154]
NDP:
Neighbor Discovery Protocol
RATInd:
Registered Address Type Indicator
ROVR:
Registration Ownership Verifier
TID:
Transaction ID

3. Updating RFC 8928

In [RFC8928], the C-flag is specified in the EARO flags field at bit position 3 (as depicted in the Figure 1 of [RFC8928]); however, [RFC8928] fails to register its position with IANA. Later, [RFC9685] defined the P-field in bits 2 and 3 of the EARO flags field and obtained proper IANA registration, but this introduced an overlap with the representation in [RFC8928]. To resolve the conflict, this specification updates [RFC8928] by repositioning the C-flag to bit 1 of the EARO flags field, thereby avoiding the overlapping definitions. Moreover, figure 1 of this I-D replaces the Figure 1 [RFC8928].

   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |     Type      |     Length    |F|PrefixLength |    Opaque     |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |R|C| P | I |R|T|     TID       |     Registration Lifetime     |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |                                                               |
 ...               Registration Ownership Verifier               ...
  |                  (64, 128, 192, or 256 bits)                  |
  |                                                               |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: Extended Address Registration Option (EARO) Format in NS messages

Option fields of interest for this specification:

Type:
33
Length:
Defined in [RFC8505] and copied in the "EARO Length" field in the associated Crypto-ID Parameters Option (CIPO).
F:
1-bit flag. It MUST be set to zero by the sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver[I-D.ietf-6lo-prefix-registration].
Prefix Length:
8-bit unsigned integer. It MUST be set to zero by the sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver [I-D.ietf-6lo-prefix-registration]
Opaque:
8-bit field opaque to ND. It MUST be set to 0 when not used. Defined in [RFC8505].
R (Reserved):
1-bit reserved field. It MUST be set to zero by the sender and MUST be ignored by the receiver.
C:
1-bit flag, moved from its position in Figure 1 of [RFC8928]. It is set to indicate that the ROVR field contains a Crypto-ID and that the 6LN MAY be challenged for ownership.
P:
2-bit field for Registered Address Type Indicator (RATInd). Indicates whether an address is unicast, multicast, or anycast. Used to transport the RATInd in different protocols. All values registry are defined in Table 2 of [RFC9685].
I:
2-bit integer field that helps to decide how to use the 8-bit Opaque field. When 0, it means the Opaque field has info about the default routing path. Other values are reserved. Defined in [RFC8505].
R:
1-bit flag. Registering Node sets the R-flag to request reachability services for the Registered Address from a Routing Registrar. Defined in [RFC8505].
T:
1-bit falg. Set if the next octet is used as a TID. Defined in [RFC8505].
TID and Registration Lifetime:
8-bit unsigned integer that tracks transactions for registrations. It's incremented with each new transaction and ignored unless the T-flag is set. Defined in [RFC8505].
Registration Lifetime:
16-bit integer representing the lifetime in minutes of the Registered Address. Zero indicates the registration has ended, and the associated state MUST be removed. Defined in [RFC8505].
Registration Ownership Verifier (ROVR):
Variable length field, used to verify who "owns" a registered IPv6 address [RFC8505]. When the C-flag is set, this field contains a Crypto-ID [RFC8928].

4. Security Considerations

This specification does not introduce any new security considerations beyond those already discussed in [RFC8928] and [RFC8505].

5. IANA Considerations

5.1. Bit Position of the C-flag

This specification updates the location of the C-flag introduced in [RFC8928] to position it as bit 1 in the EARO flags field. IANA is requested to refernce this RFC in addition to [RFC8928] when updating the "Address Registration Option Flags" [IANA.ICMP.ARO.FLG] registry under the heading "Internet Control Message Protocol version 6 (ICMPv6) Parameters" as specified in Table 1:

Table 1: Bit Position of the C-flag
ARO flag Meaning Reference
1 (suggested) C-Flag RFC 8928

6. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4861]
Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman, "Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 4861, DOI 10.17487/RFC4861, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4861>.
[RFC4862]
Thomson, S., Narten, T., and T. Jinmei, "IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration", RFC 4862, DOI 10.17487/RFC4862, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4862>.
[RFC6775]
Shelby, Z., Ed., Chakrabarti, S., Nordmark, E., and C. Bormann, "Neighbor Discovery Optimization for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs)", RFC 6775, DOI 10.17487/RFC6775, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6775>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8505]
Thubert, P., Ed., Nordmark, E., Chakrabarti, S., and C. Perkins, "Registration Extensions for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Neighbor Discovery", RFC 8505, DOI 10.17487/RFC8505, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8505>.
[RFC8928]
Thubert, P., Ed., Sarikaya, B., Sethi, M., and R. Struik, "Address-Protected Neighbor Discovery for Low-Power and Lossy Networks", RFC 8928, DOI 10.17487/RFC8928, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8928>.
[RFC9685]
Thubert, P., Ed., "Listener Subscription for IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Multicast and Anycast Addresses", RFC 9685, DOI 10.17487/RFC9685, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9685>.
[I-D.ietf-6lo-prefix-registration]
Thubert, P., "IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Prefix Registration", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-10, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-10>.
[IANA.ICMP.ARO.FLG]
IANA, "IANA Registry for the Address Registration Option Flags", IANA, https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xhtml#icmpv6-adress-registration-option-flags.

7. Informative References

[IEEE802154]
IEEE standard for Information Technology, "IEEE Std 802.15.4, Part. 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks".
[RFC8929]
Thubert, P., Ed., Perkins, C.E., and E. Levy-Abegnoli, "IPv6 Backbone Router", RFC 8929, DOI 10.17487/RFC8929, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8929>.

Authors' Addresses

Pascal Thubert
06330 Roquefort-les-Pins
France
Adnan Rashid
Politecnico di Bari
Via Edoardo Orabona 4
70126 Bari
Italy